Bookmark with del.icio.us submit It%27s%20pronounced%20%22vyoo-roo%22 digg.com reddit

It's pronounced "vyoo-roo"

I added support for Firefox, Safari and Internet Explorer to viewru. It also now works on Chrome 3 in addition to Chrome 4. On non-Chrome browsers, the user experience has been simplified so that it's reasonably performant. So browse and listen away with your browser of choice.

Also, nearly everyone that's asked me about viewru doesn't know how to pronounce it. I pronounce it "vyoo-roo" (like "guru" with a "view").
Bookmark with del.icio.us submit Progressive%20XMLHttpRequest digg.com reddit

Progressive XMLHttpRequest

Perhaps it's subtle, but the draft spec for XMLHttpRequest calls for support for progressive response handling:

4.7.6 The responseText attribute

The responseText attribute must return the result of running these steps:

1. If the state is not LOADING or DONE return the empty string and terminate these steps.

2. Return the text response entity body.

To rephrase for my purposes, responseText should return the intermediate contents of the response when an XMLHttpRequest is interrogated during the LOADING state. It'll take a little work to handle these partial responses as valid script, but let's first address browser support. Firefox and Webkit browsers already support this behavior if you set the Content-Type header of your response correctly. IE8 throws an exception when responseText is accessed before readyState reaches COMPLETE.

I ran a modified version of the streaming response tests I used in my last post to verify progressive XHR handling. The server returns several chunks in 100ms intervals that include script that indicates how much of the response was received before it is first handled by the browser.

  Bytes Buffered
Configuration Firefox 3.5 Chrome 3.0 IE 8
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked 111 536 N/A
Content-Type: text/html
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked
111 N/A N/A
Content-Type: text/plain
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked
111 85 N/A
Content-Type: application/x-javascript
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked
111 111 N/A

For Webkit browsers, it's critical to specify a Content-Type of "text/plain" or "application/x-javascript" when returning script content to an XHR for progressive handling. Seems reasonable, but it's easy to neglect. In my testing, I didn't see any change in behavior in the presence of a "charset" param.

Note that Microsoft's documentation for XMLHttpRequest now refers the to draft specification. I'm hopeful that we'll be seeing support for progressive responses soon.

Now, since we'll be interpreting partial response content as executable script, we'll need to do something to ensure that each chunk we evaluate terminates on a complete expression. For this test, I added delimiters between valid blocks of source:

window.aFunction();
// -- //
window.bFunction();
// -- //

Where //--// is the delimiter. When outputting using chunked transfer encoding, you might organize code so that a delimiter is present at the end of each chunk boundary. On each readyState change, if the state is LOADING or DONE, I call a function to read the new content, identify a safe place to trim it, and append it to a buffer.

var index = 0;
var buffer = '';
var DELIMITER = '//--//';

function handlePartialResponse(request) {
  var i = request.responseText.lastIndexOf(DELIMITER);
  if (i > index) {
    i += DELIMITER.length;
    var newChunk = request.responseText.substr(index, (i - index));
    buffer += newChunk;
    index = i;
    flushBuffer();
  }
}

Finally, we evaluate the contents of the buffer. It's not necessary to remove the delimiter, since it's a valid JavaScript comment.

function flushBuffer() {
  window.eval(buffer);
  buffer = '';
}

What would you use this for? Consider this technique for the response channel in your next Comet app or any time you're able to deliver part of a script response while doing expensive server side work to produce the rest.
Bookmark with del.icio.us submit Performance%20Implications%20of%20%22charset%22. digg.com reddit

Performance Implications of "charset".

A while back, I wrote a post documenting the progressive response handling behavior of different browsers. I was specifically interested in how many bytes must be received or how much time must pass before a browser begins to parse content. My friend and colleague, Bryan McQuade (a co-author of Google PageSpeed), recently pointed out that character encoding detection is the source of buffering delay in response handling. Specifically, in the absence of a "charset" param in the Content-Type header, a browser may buffer a large quantity of content while looking for a <meta> tag declaring the content encoding.

I set up a new round of tests to identify the impact that content encoding declarations have on progressive response handling in different browsers. As in previous tests, the server returns several chunks, in 100ms intervals, each containing script that indicates how much of the response has been received.

  Bytes Buffered
Configuration Firefox 3.5 Chrome 3.0 IE 8
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked 1134 1056 300
Content-Type: text/html
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked
204 1056 341
Content-Type: text/html
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked
...
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
166 204 218
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Tranfer-Encoding: chunked
204 280 300

Note that the test doesn't account for content in the document <head>, so the numbers for the <meta> configuration are artificially short by ~70b.

It's clear that for Chrome and Firefox, indicating the charset has a measurable impact on performance. Now, is it more desirable to declare the charset in the Content-Type header or a <meta> tag? Darin Fisher suggests that placing it in the response header is more performant: The charset impacts how the response is parsed, so when the browser encounters the <meta> tag, it must reprocess everything it's handled so far. If you're forced to use the <meta>, place it as near as possible to the top of the document to reduce the amount of throwaway work done by the browser.
Bookmark with del.icio.us submit ViewRu%3A%20An%20Interactive%20Music%20Browser%20and%20Player digg.com reddit

ViewRu: An Interactive Music Browser and Player

For a long time, I've been excited about the idea of creating browsable interfaces that convey information about the similarity of items using their relative proximity (who wouldn't be excited about that?). In 2006, I created JSViz and a whole bunch of demos to explore the space. A major point of frustration was JavaScript and DOM performance, especially while scaling the number of items or edges in a graph. JavaScript->DOM interaction has greatly improved in the latest generation of browsers, so a few weeks ago I set out to turn an old demo into a useful application:


ViewRu is an interactive music browser and player. It uses artist relationships from open APIs and music streams from YouTube to provide a single interface for exploring and listening to music. Presently, it takes advantage of browser features and performance only available in Google Chrome 4.

Check it out at www.viewru.com and let me know what you think.
Bookmark with del.icio.us submit Firefox%20Paint%20Events%20Update digg.com reddit

Firefox Paint Events Update

I recently posted about a Firefox / Firebug extension for digging into Firefox's new MozAfterPaint events. I just posted my second update to the Firefox Addons site. In addition to highlighting the clip area of paint events, this update adds screenshots so it's possible to see the page state at the time of an event:

Note that capturing the screen for each paint event adds significant overhead, so it's wise to leave this feature disabled when not actively using it. Other handy features include the ability to view event details on the Firebug DOM tab:

And dig into the complete events details:

The "image" attribute above is a data URL of the screen capture. I imagine this will have some other practical uses. Some other event types are logged for reference, and clicking on any event will reset the base time to the time of that event, to make it easier to see how actions relate to paints:

To use this extension, you will need a 3.1+ Firefox pre-release and Firebug 1.3. You can pick up the latest version of Firebug Paint Events here.

Search